Open live demos
Compare multiple integration scenarios, from full toolbar editing to localization and template-driven content.
Browse demosTyped rich text editing
TSRichTextEditor wraps the shipping browser runtime with typed loader utilities, typed editor options, and a real TypeScript build pipeline, so teams can adopt the editor in modern frontend stacks without falling back to any.
Built on the proven RichTextEditor browser runtime and packaged for modern TypeScript applications.
The wrapper keeps the proven editor runtime, adds typed creation helpers, and makes it easier to wire assets, config, and events in modern frontend stacks.
import { createRichTextEditor } from "ts-rich-text-editor";
const editor = await createRichTextEditor("#editor", {
toolbar: "full",
skin: "default",
showTagList: true
}, {
basePath: "/assets/ts-rich-text-editor/dist/richtexteditor"
});
Homepage editor preview
Start here
Some teams want to test the live editor right away, some want examples they can open locally, and some just want the package. This gives each path a clear next step from the homepage.
Compare multiple integration scenarios, from full toolbar editing to localization and template-driven content.
Browse demosGet a standalone local demo package with one ready-to-run page and the required editor assets included.
Download test driveGrab the portable examples pack if you want a self-contained bundle with assets, scripts, and sample pages.
Download examplesStart from the compiled TypeScript tarball when your next step is integrating the editor into an application.
Open downloadsWhat ships
This package keeps the proven browser runtime intact and makes it usable from TypeScript with clean imports, declarations, runtime asset sync, and a demo that boots the editor through the typed API.
createRichTextEditor(...), TypeScriptRichTextEditor, typed events, typed config interfaces, and typed browser-global declarations all ship from the package build.
The published TypeScript package keeps richtexteditor runtime assets in sync from the JavaScript project so there is one trusted editor runtime, not two drifting versions.
The included demo proves the wrapper is real by loading the editor, reacting to change events, and rendering typed HTML output directly in the browser.
Compared with the market
The editor landscape spans commercial drop-in suites, headless editing frameworks, and block-first JSON editors. This TypeScript edition is positioned for teams that still want a traditional visual editor experience, but do not want to give up typed integration and local ownership of the runtime assets.
Editors like TinyMCE, CKEditor, and Froala compete on breadth, premium workflows, and polished WYSIWYG experiences. TS RichTextEditor answers with a mature visual editor workflow plus a simpler downloadable TypeScript wrapper and bundled runtime path.
Tools like Tiptap, Lexical, ProseMirror, and Slate are powerful when you want to build your own editor UX from the ground up. TS RichTextEditor is the better fit when you want toolbar-first editing without building every interaction yourself.
Block-first tools like Editor.js focus on structured JSON output and modular content blocks. TS RichTextEditor stays focused on classic document-style HTML authoring, previewing, and editing workflows.
Feature fit
Instead of trying to cover every workflow at once, the package focuses on the capabilities teams usually need first when evaluating a TypeScript-ready WYSIWYG editor.
Full toolbar authoring, rich HTML output, read-only viewing, and classic document-style editing patterns.
Typed creation helpers, typed config surfaces, typed event wiring, and a package shape that fits TypeScript workflows.
Standalone test drive, downloadable examples, and a source bundle so teams can move from trial to inspection quickly.
Where It Fits Fastest
This TypeScript edition is especially useful when your project needs a classic visual editor, a local runtime you can inspect, and less editor-shell work before users can start writing.
Great for dashboards, back offices, CMS screens, and knowledge management tools where a full WYSIWYG surface matters more than building a custom editor product.
Helpful when teams are replacing textarea-based forms or older JavaScript integrations and want a smoother TypeScript-friendly adoption path.
Best for organizations that want a local package, examples zip, and standalone test drive before committing engineering time to a larger integration.
Strong fit when your storage, preview, and publishing flow still revolves around HTML instead of a block JSON model or a custom editor schema.
Quick comparison
This is a practical comparison for teams choosing between a visual editor, a framework-first editor stack, or a block-based content model. It is meant to speed up evaluation, not flatten every editor into the same shape.
FAQ
If your team wants to design a custom editor product, a headless framework may still be the right choice. This package is for teams that want users editing quickly without building the whole editor shell first.
Because many evaluations stall before integration starts. The standalone test drive lets users download, serve, and test the editor locally with almost no setup.
The wrapper gives teams typed creation, typed configuration, typed event wiring, and a clearer runtime-loading path around the browser editor assets.
Teams that still want classic rich HTML authoring, but want the evaluation, packaging, and integration experience to feel more natural in TypeScript projects.
Adoption path
This site is the TypeScript track beside the JavaScript editor. It gives teams a place to evaluate the package, open the live demo, and download both the packaged build and the full source bundle.
Use the package download or the source zip, depending on whether you need consumption or extension.
Point the loader at the bundled richtexteditor assets and create the editor through the typed wrapper.
Keep editor setup and event wiring inside TypeScript instead of carrying raw browser globals everywhere.
Coverage
Ready to explore?
The site gives you three practical ways to evaluate the TypeScript edition, depending on whether you want to browse, build, or integrate.